Court Fixes November 20 for Judgment as Nnamdi Kanu Waives Right to Defence

A Federal High Court in Abuja has officially set November 20 as the date for judgment in the terrorism case against Nnamdi Kanu, the embattled IPOB leader. This crucial announcement was made after Nnamdi Kanu waived his right to defence, opting not to present his case within the six days granted to him by the court. The decision marks a turning point in the protracted legal battle that began following his controversial re-arrest and detention.

Presiding over the case, Justice James Omotosho confirmed that the defendant was given sufficient opportunity to defend himself but deliberately chose not to exercise that right. The judge emphasized that Nnamdi Kanu waives right to defence knowingly and that such a decision means he cannot later allege that the court denied him a fair hearing. Justice Omotosho maintained that the trial process had adhered to constitutional standards, granting the IPOB leader every chance to present evidence or call witnesses if he desired.

By waiving his right to defence, Nnamdi Kanu essentially closed the door on his own chance to directly influence the court’s final ruling. Legal experts say this move could have far-reaching implications, as it allows the court to proceed straight to judgment without further delays. The judge clarified that the court had extended all necessary fairness, and since the defendant decided not to act, the legal process must continue unhindered.

Observers believe the November 20 judgment will be a defining moment in Nigeria’s judicial and political history. The case has consistently stirred public debate due to its connection with sensitive national issues such as self-determination, justice, and human rights. Many see it as a test of Nigeria’s judiciary and its ability to balance national security concerns with constitutional liberties.

The development that Nnamdi Kanu waives right to defence underscores his current legal strategy — one that appears to rely more on procedural or political outcomes than on courtroom arguments. While supporters of Kanu view his actions as a protest against what they describe as an unfair trial, critics argue that refusing to defend himself weakens his position and leaves the court with little choice but to rely on the prosecution’s evidence.

Justice Omotosho’s pronouncement reinforces that Kanu’s decision was voluntary and made with full awareness of its consequences. The court, he said, cannot compel any defendant to defend themselves; it can only provide the platform for justice to be served fairly. Therefore, when Nnamdi Kanu waives right to defence, it means the trial has effectively reached its final phase, awaiting only the court’s judgment.

As the November 20 date approaches, public attention remains fixed on the outcome of this high-profile case. Regardless of the verdict, the phrase “Nnamdi Kanu waives right to defence” will continue to echo across legal and political discussions, symbolizing one of the most dramatic decisions in the long-running IPOB saga. The judgment day is expected to draw widespread media coverage, as Nigerians and the international community await the next chapter in this landmark trial.